in this country living only 20 voters, still 10 children and young people under 16 and 2 above, as well as an inmate of the prison and a psychologically supervised, but not generally dangerous madman. 20 people in regular meetings to decide on the allocation of resources, joint construction projects, education training, and medical care for the citizens. We choose a chancellor, who represents the country to the outside, collecting the taxes and take care of the administration. A mathematically sophisticated system burdened earners with comparable higher tax burden than low earners. At private companies, such as building a house available, then each other in their efforts. Some families are more affluent and the press in status symbols, such as a large house, expensive holidays and a big car. Others are not so good, but they have a roof over their heads, a healthy diet and first-class education and medical care. All leave school with a conclusion and at least learn a trade. Everyone has the opportunity to enroll at a university. 2 companies to work longer than 10 hours per day, the workers and employees but only about 6 hours. There is no unemployment. The entrepreneurs have higher incomes.
Suppose one of those companies will now try to evade taxes and money just so foreign to invest in a foundation. What would happen? What if one would try the public, the other to rip with surprise internet increases? What if a lawyer would admonish a citizen with regard to an incomplete imprint on the Internet? What if the Chancellor decides to have a nuclear transport or drive through the country to send soldiers to Afghanistan? Hi, this country has only 34 inhabitants. Everyone knows everyone by name and know about know about the personal relationships. Well, what would happen?
is the resolution: The Common Sense prevails. Common Sense! Price increases, ripoff, warning letters, nuclear transport, foreign missions, all would be unenforceable. On the contrary, the protagonists have to adjust to tough sanctions.
So what is the difference this little democracy to Germany? Can we afford that 8% of students go without a diploma from the school? Do we want a lawyer state, where justice is defined by paragraphs, which allow rip off the internet and warning wave? Do we want a country secure in the wealthy, a broad range of medical care while other life-saving drugs are denied? What is a democracy where 50% of business leaders, recruited from the 0.5% of the richest segment of the population, make it virtually no women or immigrants in important positions in the 50% of the people's representatives lawyers, political scientists, teachers, economists and civil servants are? If this is the will of the electorate? Or maybe even an expression of the impotence of the voters?
Let us return to our small country. Again, there are rich and less well-off. But no one has to have existence or future fears. In the small number of citizens with a high degree of transparency prevails. Operations can not be taken anonymously, everything always comes to light. One might add the word clarity. The information flow is tangible and possibly not legal language by lawyers, so that everyone can gain an insight into current operations. And everyone can participate and reach a verdict in the next town hall meeting with the orders for the executive, that the chancellor. Why should this not be possible in Germany be?
0 comments:
Post a Comment