Sun
Germany is one of the most populous country on earth, stands with his 14th in more than 82 million square Of these, approximately 62 million are eligible to vote. Most recently, 27 parties have submitted to the Bundestag election, of which only 7 were able to choose more than 2% of the electorate votes. 3 parties claim for themselves the concept of People's Party claim, think, then, that nearly everyone can choose for any reason. These are the CDU, CSU and SPD. The other parties are called clientele parties because they appeal to a certain constituency. The FDP, the wealthy and "the economy", the Greens and environmentalists and disarmament, the Left the workers, the poor and Linksintelektuellen and the pirates and the Internet community. Only the parties that the nationwide company in the second vote count, the 5% hurdle and bring it in at least three constituencies on a direct mandate to come to the Bundestag, where they form a so-called Group. A single non-party member can also be directly elected in the Bundestag and that on the first vote. This will then be attached.
In general, the Bundestag has 612 members, by so-called overhang mandates, it may well be even over 620. On this detail but I would not go in that context. About half of the deputies will be directly over a sent the 299 constituencies in the Bundestag, the other ones on the Land lists of parties. A good place on the national list is usually reserved for party grandees who have made over many years deserves. New people usually come on the back seat.
Almost a quarter of politicians are lawyers, 13.5% are teachers, and nearly 5% each economists, political scientists or officials. More than half the members come from just 5 fields of work. Just under a third of MPs are women, and when it comes to the age of the people's representatives, then this is about 50 years, about 8% above the German average age of 42. Just over 2% of MPs are under the age of 30 years.
The elections to the Bundestag are held every 4 years. The parties present their election platforms, the respective tours advertising, beer tents and speak in public places (Merkel is ...). The electorate can I watch the programs are usually not spread his sympathies and goes to the polls. Once there he must forgive his first vote (direct candidate) and his second vote (country list). Most of the electorate has been busy at that time little more than an hour with the person of the candidate. Several magazines offer choice aids, such as at the ballot-o-Mat, which are usually drawn to play rate.
In any case, be made now 2 crosses the political will of checkmarks to 4 years at the mercy bind. Best of all: the choice program, or campaign promises not to be met. Although voters may have decided on the basis of the platform or the election promises for a candidate and a party, the MPs behind quite free in their decision-making. In addition, it has been customary in Germany to vote in closed groups. This means that all FDP members choose streamlined usually the same, just as the CDU, CSU, SPD, Greens and Left representatives. In a coalition can thus designated minority concerns suddenly get a majority vote. Although truly exceptional, happen unprecedented things, we are the mercy of the creative will and discernment are elected.
And so it happens that: If a bank within a few weeks saved over 100 billion € from bankruptcy, soldiers will be sent to Afghanistan in terms extend for nuclear power plants, hotels in Germany just 12% of the VAT to be paid and a partner country from the Euro zone 8 billion euros in development aid are promised. In Germany, by Internet, telephone marketing, restrictive contracts in fitness centers, banks, insurance companies, Payback cards, gas stations, telecom providers can systematically using the law to rip off run.
The list of decisions which most likely by a majority of Germans would be rejected outright, would fill many pages.
We're powerless on the sidelines and have to be content that the makers are democratically and we finally could have chosen differently.
And by now we wonder: Is there another way? What is our democracy worth? Who really makes the policy when there are so many dubious decisions? Why is it always tells me that I could still occur for participating in a party. Why do I need to connect one of these clubs, along with other citizens of my democratic INTERESTS? Why there is no direct democracy, where can I get to the actual problem?
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
How To Sew Sausage Dog Draft Excluder
This is not a democracy
Ask people around you: You live in a democracy? The answer of 9 out of 10 is clear: Yes! And then you go? There is already differentiated. Only 6 out of 10, sometimes much less to be yes! . Reply And when you ask a little further: Does your voice to influence policy? Then turning to the initial ratio to radically because 9 out of 10 are to attest that they tend to feel that the elected politicians do anyway, what they want.
Ask people around you: You live in a democracy? The answer of 9 out of 10 is clear: Yes! And then you go? There is already differentiated. Only 6 out of 10, sometimes much less to be yes! . Reply And when you ask a little further: Does your voice to influence policy? Then turning to the initial ratio to radically because 9 out of 10 are to attest that they tend to feel that the elected politicians do anyway, what they want.
The resulting Phenomenon is then called politics.
This blog makes the determination for the cause of political apathy, and the formulation of feasible ways out for the task. It is about nothing less than achieving real democracy. Yes we can.
Sunday, September 2, 2007
Glengarry Bonnettf2 Symbol On It
pickings
derstadnard.at also a live reporting has had the protocols can be found under http://derstandard.at/?url=/?ressort=wahltvduelle.
my current résumé:
talks the summer for me was always the media highlight of the summer. I remember years ago only 2 when armin wolf HC Strache in all of journalism rules filleted. Last year there was with gabi waldner a worthy, albeit non-presenter Sun journalistisc occasional slip. this was for oberhauser turn, either slept or nothing said. critical demand, there was no more, Molter and Gusenbauer could unpack their totally uncritical wahlkampfrethorik.
I personally wish me to Summer 2008 Wolf talks armin again.
my next point of criticism is that the senung is sent no longer live. What are the orf has anxiety? for me that is a sad sign that subsequently changes to the calls can be made (to cut out things, ect).
hospitable to journalists: I found the idea quite well, in the style of the press to invite additional hour a journalist. however, that the standard and the press were excluded, I think a nerve.
the journalists were ansich ok, the lord of crowns of the newspaper was the weakest. was quite strong (I shudder to write this now myself) Fellner, the strache quite ready has made.
my biggest criticisms leveled at the summer meetings of the wall ingrained that it is summer talks with all five men round is a pure act has. at least the editor in chief of the default is female, it would have been the absolute minimum to invite them.
the idea of summer talks blogs I found brilliant. within a very short time, the project got a certain momentum, there have mitgebloggt politicians (though not by all parties), we were not unnoticed in digitaln Sindern cosmos were apparently read it. the show refer to various other blogs.
this idea must be pursued in any case.
last border I thank all mitbloggerInnen for the exciting and interesting discussions controversial.
you see (writing) hopefully next year, until then
stay tuned!
derstadnard.at also a live reporting has had the protocols can be found under http://derstandard.at/?url=/?ressort=wahltvduelle.
my current résumé:
talks the summer for me was always the media highlight of the summer. I remember years ago only 2 when armin wolf HC Strache in all of journalism rules filleted. Last year there was with gabi waldner a worthy, albeit non-presenter Sun journalistisc occasional slip. this was for oberhauser turn, either slept or nothing said. critical demand, there was no more, Molter and Gusenbauer could unpack their totally uncritical wahlkampfrethorik.
I personally wish me to Summer 2008 Wolf talks armin again.
my next point of criticism is that the senung is sent no longer live. What are the orf has anxiety? for me that is a sad sign that subsequently changes to the calls can be made (to cut out things, ect).
hospitable to journalists: I found the idea quite well, in the style of the press to invite additional hour a journalist. however, that the standard and the press were excluded, I think a nerve.
the journalists were ansich ok, the lord of crowns of the newspaper was the weakest. was quite strong (I shudder to write this now myself) Fellner, the strache quite ready has made.
my biggest criticisms leveled at the summer meetings of the wall ingrained that it is summer talks with all five men round is a pure act has. at least the editor in chief of the default is female, it would have been the absolute minimum to invite them.
the idea of summer talks blogs I found brilliant. within a very short time, the project got a certain momentum, there have mitgebloggt politicians (though not by all parties), we were not unnoticed in digitaln Sindern cosmos were apparently read it. the show refer to various other blogs.
this idea must be pursued in any case.
last border I thank all mitbloggerInnen for the exciting and interesting discussions controversial.
you see (writing) hopefully next year, until then
stay tuned!
Saturday, September 1, 2007
Slogan Of Spice Jet Airways
comment in my blog My Resume
Gusenbauer very supportive attitude I've called it :-) & Tips: Debate on the crisis of the Greens in Glocalist be published in the current new articles (mine is also in the Ceiberweiber with a summary of the other comments mirrored)
PS: How were the Greens for their own parody (a satire on the old Reform Party in the 90s sounds quite current ....). And in Blog : To get excited about Andrea Kdolsky (which goes through men the other hand, so all "Mehrweiberei" is also in very conservative circles, no problem.) Is
Gusenbauer very supportive attitude I've called it :-) & Tips: Debate on the crisis of the Greens in Glocalist be published in the current new articles (mine is also in the Ceiberweiber with a summary of the other comments mirrored)
PS: How were the Greens for their own parody (a satire on the old Reform Party in the 90s sounds quite current ....). And in Blog : To get excited about Andrea Kdolsky (which goes through men the other hand, so all "Mehrweiberei" is also in very conservative circles, no problem.) Is
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)