Determination of the new Federal President
Today, the new president will be confirmed. After the departure of the well at the time designated by Chancellor Merkel, Horst Köhler, she has after that by her own sour-faced policy of a surprise given his office has decided for a new man. Christian Wulff is still prime minister of Lower Saxony. A man who is clear about the parties and from out of this neutrality is one of the best to represent all Germans in this high office. A scandal-free politicians with character strength. His name stands for integration, he has a first Turkish-born Muslim, we let it melt on your tongue, woman, young and non-Christian-named the Minister. And he shows how an agricultural country like Germany Niedersachsen works without agribusiness lobby. With foresight, he has raised the lobby directly to the executive chair of the Agriculture Minister. Ms Grothe is the owner of several poultry farms (commonly known as chicken-KZ), but has also promised to use the organic sector. Sun prophylactic Bioeierhöfe 9 were closed for food contamination (http://tinyurl.com/35gvdgo). They also know and therefore our next President, that the sowing of GM maize for human and animal is completely safe (http://tinyurl.com/37kluz9). With so much trust can we trust, is not it? And one small thing. Mr. Wulff , shortly before he moved to Berlin not just in the Lower Saxony Parliament Parliamentary allowances increased by 7.2%. It is therefore still be fallen far short of the recommendation of an independent commission and must be recognized.
We now come back to today's confirmation. The so-called Federal Assembly, a kind of Althing, which is composed of the members of parliament, regional representatives and ambassadors from various units now give the okay for today, Mrs Merkel their personal choice. The so-called electoral college will decide in a democratic majority in the Lord Wulff. Good to know that the CSU is a man behind the candidate and no dissenters in Bavaria will be. An important signal is the virtually certain, and not democratically elected Horst Seehofer, the Lower Saxony from Munich on the road.
If we know now already, as starting the whole theater, why does this ominous Federal Assembly are still together? Because it must justify the decision of the Chancellor democratic. Only the Federal Parliament may approve, the pick of Ms Merkel to be the highest in the Federal Republic to be assigned duties on behalf of the people.
And now, I slipped out a word which has nothing to do here: the people. Greek demos. This occurs, for people at all any more. Every four years we spin the politicians and parties fully on all cylinders, but millions investing in ridiculous campaigns and be elected to a snapshot of. Scandals are covered up (tank truck bombing, etc.), deferred unpleasant decisions (health insurance premium increase, etc.) and applied the make-centimeter thick. 15% of the seats were the last time the tax cut party FDP. Just the hotel tax was lowered to the reduced rate of 7% tax rate and now the party is after the last polls in nurmehr 4% of voters in favor. The CDU / CSU came to just under 35%, but you have a 3% excess mandates in her lap and then it has served for the majority. Today would be 32% of Black voters tick.
Let's go one step further and consider the politics of low turnout of only 72.2% due, then by "majority" be no more talk.
And so can draw several parallels today.
first China. In the People's Republic, the highest positions are awarded to deserving party members. The consensus of a small caste leadership is sufficient.
second The chancellor election of 1933, in which the winning candidate had no means the majority of Germans behind him. So the man was set from above.
third Iran, where in our view, moderate and more conciliatory candidate Rezai had no chance to win the seat.
4. Zimbabwe. Robert Mugabe cares a damn about the concerns of his people. In the snapshot of his re-election, he allowed himself to be at the head of the country confirm.
5th Greece. The money aristocracy and the political caste is doing very well. The people are protesting as anarchic, anti-democratic and anti-European dismissed.
etc., etc.
Today we have reached the bottom. The country moves on talent show, Peter Zwegat and Attention control level. On all fours, the country washed by the crisis. Anything that can be done is somehow wrong and come back pats on the shoulders. Since I commend
China, Iran, Venezuela, Bolivia and several others at first glance little democratic Events. The bottom line is, unfortunately, but that the political leadership of these countries is contrary to the oligarchs to Mrs Merkel is no mortgage on the life, education and prospects for the next 5 generations. The population is not placed on the next 100 years in the cast of decision constraints.
Now would not the political situation in each of these countries for the Federal Republic. The comparison, however, remains a moral: When do we have a democracy, we must also live active and exercise. And as the Federal Republic of Germany, we should we take out an example for the world to try. Organizationally and technologically is it possible to enter politics, but not Parteienfilz, interested citizens in all key decisions to one vote. And even if we feel 72.2% turnout in the general election in 2009 as a low, it is still the overwhelming majority of voters who have found their way to the polls. The vast majority are ready to cooperate in the choices of our country. We are the people and we want to choose our President directly. We want to choose our chancellor directly and we want to be involved in all important decisions: Social policy, family policy, education policy, foreign aid, the armed forces abroad, energy policy, debt crisis and all others. The vote on the smoking ban is the least of einzufordernde decision. We, the people do make choices. We are being lied to every 4 years again? No matter, because we can directly co-decide. In referendums we can bring our policy on track. When is it finally? (Http://tinyurl.com/2vxqxtk)
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Job Thats Work With Horses
A little democracy is democracy in Germany
in this country living only 20 voters, still 10 children and young people under 16 and 2 above, as well as an inmate of the prison and a psychologically supervised, but not generally dangerous madman. 20 people in regular meetings to decide on the allocation of resources, joint construction projects, education training, and medical care for the citizens. We choose a chancellor, who represents the country to the outside, collecting the taxes and take care of the administration. A mathematically sophisticated system burdened earners with comparable higher tax burden than low earners. At private companies, such as building a house available, then each other in their efforts. Some families are more affluent and the press in status symbols, such as a large house, expensive holidays and a big car. Others are not so good, but they have a roof over their heads, a healthy diet and first-class education and medical care. All leave school with a conclusion and at least learn a trade. Everyone has the opportunity to enroll at a university. 2 companies to work longer than 10 hours per day, the workers and employees but only about 6 hours. There is no unemployment. The entrepreneurs have higher incomes.
Suppose one of those companies will now try to evade taxes and money just so foreign to invest in a foundation. What would happen? What if one would try the public, the other to rip with surprise internet increases? What if a lawyer would admonish a citizen with regard to an incomplete imprint on the Internet? What if the Chancellor decides to have a nuclear transport or drive through the country to send soldiers to Afghanistan? Hi, this country has only 34 inhabitants. Everyone knows everyone by name and know about know about the personal relationships. Well, what would happen?
is the resolution: The Common Sense prevails. Common Sense! Price increases, ripoff, warning letters, nuclear transport, foreign missions, all would be unenforceable. On the contrary, the protagonists have to adjust to tough sanctions.
So what is the difference this little democracy to Germany? Can we afford that 8% of students go without a diploma from the school? Do we want a lawyer state, where justice is defined by paragraphs, which allow rip off the internet and warning wave? Do we want a country secure in the wealthy, a broad range of medical care while other life-saving drugs are denied? What is a democracy where 50% of business leaders, recruited from the 0.5% of the richest segment of the population, make it virtually no women or immigrants in important positions in the 50% of the people's representatives lawyers, political scientists, teachers, economists and civil servants are? If this is the will of the electorate? Or maybe even an expression of the impotence of the voters?
Let us return to our small country. Again, there are rich and less well-off. But no one has to have existence or future fears. In the small number of citizens with a high degree of transparency prevails. Operations can not be taken anonymously, everything always comes to light. One might add the word clarity. The information flow is tangible and possibly not legal language by lawyers, so that everyone can gain an insight into current operations. And everyone can participate and reach a verdict in the next town hall meeting with the orders for the executive, that the chancellor. Why should this not be possible in Germany be?
in this country living only 20 voters, still 10 children and young people under 16 and 2 above, as well as an inmate of the prison and a psychologically supervised, but not generally dangerous madman. 20 people in regular meetings to decide on the allocation of resources, joint construction projects, education training, and medical care for the citizens. We choose a chancellor, who represents the country to the outside, collecting the taxes and take care of the administration. A mathematically sophisticated system burdened earners with comparable higher tax burden than low earners. At private companies, such as building a house available, then each other in their efforts. Some families are more affluent and the press in status symbols, such as a large house, expensive holidays and a big car. Others are not so good, but they have a roof over their heads, a healthy diet and first-class education and medical care. All leave school with a conclusion and at least learn a trade. Everyone has the opportunity to enroll at a university. 2 companies to work longer than 10 hours per day, the workers and employees but only about 6 hours. There is no unemployment. The entrepreneurs have higher incomes.
Suppose one of those companies will now try to evade taxes and money just so foreign to invest in a foundation. What would happen? What if one would try the public, the other to rip with surprise internet increases? What if a lawyer would admonish a citizen with regard to an incomplete imprint on the Internet? What if the Chancellor decides to have a nuclear transport or drive through the country to send soldiers to Afghanistan? Hi, this country has only 34 inhabitants. Everyone knows everyone by name and know about know about the personal relationships. Well, what would happen?
is the resolution: The Common Sense prevails. Common Sense! Price increases, ripoff, warning letters, nuclear transport, foreign missions, all would be unenforceable. On the contrary, the protagonists have to adjust to tough sanctions.
So what is the difference this little democracy to Germany? Can we afford that 8% of students go without a diploma from the school? Do we want a lawyer state, where justice is defined by paragraphs, which allow rip off the internet and warning wave? Do we want a country secure in the wealthy, a broad range of medical care while other life-saving drugs are denied? What is a democracy where 50% of business leaders, recruited from the 0.5% of the richest segment of the population, make it virtually no women or immigrants in important positions in the 50% of the people's representatives lawyers, political scientists, teachers, economists and civil servants are? If this is the will of the electorate? Or maybe even an expression of the impotence of the voters?
Let us return to our small country. Again, there are rich and less well-off. But no one has to have existence or future fears. In the small number of citizens with a high degree of transparency prevails. Operations can not be taken anonymously, everything always comes to light. One might add the word clarity. The information flow is tangible and possibly not legal language by lawyers, so that everyone can gain an insight into current operations. And everyone can participate and reach a verdict in the next town hall meeting with the orders for the executive, that the chancellor. Why should this not be possible in Germany be?
Pinky Big Booty Newest
Sun
Germany is one of the most populous country on earth, stands with his 14th in more than 82 million square Of these, approximately 62 million are eligible to vote. Most recently, 27 parties have submitted to the Bundestag election, of which only 7 were able to choose more than 2% of the electorate votes. 3 parties claim for themselves the concept of People's Party claim, think, then, that nearly everyone can choose for any reason. These are the CDU, CSU and SPD. The other parties are called clientele parties because they appeal to a certain constituency. The FDP, the wealthy and "the economy", the Greens and environmentalists and disarmament, the Left the workers, the poor and Linksintelektuellen and the pirates and the Internet community. Only the parties that the nationwide company in the second vote count, the 5% hurdle and bring it in at least three constituencies on a direct mandate to come to the Bundestag, where they form a so-called Group. A single non-party member can also be directly elected in the Bundestag and that on the first vote. This will then be attached.
In general, the Bundestag has 612 members, by so-called overhang mandates, it may well be even over 620. On this detail but I would not go in that context. About half of the deputies will be directly over a sent the 299 constituencies in the Bundestag, the other ones on the Land lists of parties. A good place on the national list is usually reserved for party grandees who have made over many years deserves. New people usually come on the back seat.
Almost a quarter of politicians are lawyers, 13.5% are teachers, and nearly 5% each economists, political scientists or officials. More than half the members come from just 5 fields of work. Just under a third of MPs are women, and when it comes to the age of the people's representatives, then this is about 50 years, about 8% above the German average age of 42. Just over 2% of MPs are under the age of 30 years.
The elections to the Bundestag are held every 4 years. The parties present their election platforms, the respective tours advertising, beer tents and speak in public places (Merkel is ...). The electorate can I watch the programs are usually not spread his sympathies and goes to the polls. Once there he must forgive his first vote (direct candidate) and his second vote (country list). Most of the electorate has been busy at that time little more than an hour with the person of the candidate. Several magazines offer choice aids, such as at the ballot-o-Mat, which are usually drawn to play rate.
In any case, be made now 2 crosses the political will of checkmarks to 4 years at the mercy bind. Best of all: the choice program, or campaign promises not to be met. Although voters may have decided on the basis of the platform or the election promises for a candidate and a party, the MPs behind quite free in their decision-making. In addition, it has been customary in Germany to vote in closed groups. This means that all FDP members choose streamlined usually the same, just as the CDU, CSU, SPD, Greens and Left representatives. In a coalition can thus designated minority concerns suddenly get a majority vote. Although truly exceptional, happen unprecedented things, we are the mercy of the creative will and discernment are elected.
And so it happens that: If a bank within a few weeks saved over 100 billion € from bankruptcy, soldiers will be sent to Afghanistan in terms extend for nuclear power plants, hotels in Germany just 12% of the VAT to be paid and a partner country from the Euro zone 8 billion euros in development aid are promised. In Germany, by Internet, telephone marketing, restrictive contracts in fitness centers, banks, insurance companies, Payback cards, gas stations, telecom providers can systematically using the law to rip off run.
The list of decisions which most likely by a majority of Germans would be rejected outright, would fill many pages.
We're powerless on the sidelines and have to be content that the makers are democratically and we finally could have chosen differently.
And by now we wonder: Is there another way? What is our democracy worth? Who really makes the policy when there are so many dubious decisions? Why is it always tells me that I could still occur for participating in a party. Why do I need to connect one of these clubs, along with other citizens of my democratic INTERESTS? Why there is no direct democracy, where can I get to the actual problem?
Germany is one of the most populous country on earth, stands with his 14th in more than 82 million square Of these, approximately 62 million are eligible to vote. Most recently, 27 parties have submitted to the Bundestag election, of which only 7 were able to choose more than 2% of the electorate votes. 3 parties claim for themselves the concept of People's Party claim, think, then, that nearly everyone can choose for any reason. These are the CDU, CSU and SPD. The other parties are called clientele parties because they appeal to a certain constituency. The FDP, the wealthy and "the economy", the Greens and environmentalists and disarmament, the Left the workers, the poor and Linksintelektuellen and the pirates and the Internet community. Only the parties that the nationwide company in the second vote count, the 5% hurdle and bring it in at least three constituencies on a direct mandate to come to the Bundestag, where they form a so-called Group. A single non-party member can also be directly elected in the Bundestag and that on the first vote. This will then be attached.
In general, the Bundestag has 612 members, by so-called overhang mandates, it may well be even over 620. On this detail but I would not go in that context. About half of the deputies will be directly over a sent the 299 constituencies in the Bundestag, the other ones on the Land lists of parties. A good place on the national list is usually reserved for party grandees who have made over many years deserves. New people usually come on the back seat.
Almost a quarter of politicians are lawyers, 13.5% are teachers, and nearly 5% each economists, political scientists or officials. More than half the members come from just 5 fields of work. Just under a third of MPs are women, and when it comes to the age of the people's representatives, then this is about 50 years, about 8% above the German average age of 42. Just over 2% of MPs are under the age of 30 years.
The elections to the Bundestag are held every 4 years. The parties present their election platforms, the respective tours advertising, beer tents and speak in public places (Merkel is ...). The electorate can I watch the programs are usually not spread his sympathies and goes to the polls. Once there he must forgive his first vote (direct candidate) and his second vote (country list). Most of the electorate has been busy at that time little more than an hour with the person of the candidate. Several magazines offer choice aids, such as at the ballot-o-Mat, which are usually drawn to play rate.
In any case, be made now 2 crosses the political will of checkmarks to 4 years at the mercy bind. Best of all: the choice program, or campaign promises not to be met. Although voters may have decided on the basis of the platform or the election promises for a candidate and a party, the MPs behind quite free in their decision-making. In addition, it has been customary in Germany to vote in closed groups. This means that all FDP members choose streamlined usually the same, just as the CDU, CSU, SPD, Greens and Left representatives. In a coalition can thus designated minority concerns suddenly get a majority vote. Although truly exceptional, happen unprecedented things, we are the mercy of the creative will and discernment are elected.
And so it happens that: If a bank within a few weeks saved over 100 billion € from bankruptcy, soldiers will be sent to Afghanistan in terms extend for nuclear power plants, hotels in Germany just 12% of the VAT to be paid and a partner country from the Euro zone 8 billion euros in development aid are promised. In Germany, by Internet, telephone marketing, restrictive contracts in fitness centers, banks, insurance companies, Payback cards, gas stations, telecom providers can systematically using the law to rip off run.
The list of decisions which most likely by a majority of Germans would be rejected outright, would fill many pages.
We're powerless on the sidelines and have to be content that the makers are democratically and we finally could have chosen differently.
And by now we wonder: Is there another way? What is our democracy worth? Who really makes the policy when there are so many dubious decisions? Why is it always tells me that I could still occur for participating in a party. Why do I need to connect one of these clubs, along with other citizens of my democratic INTERESTS? Why there is no direct democracy, where can I get to the actual problem?
How To Sew Sausage Dog Draft Excluder
This is not a democracy
Ask people around you: You live in a democracy? The answer of 9 out of 10 is clear: Yes! And then you go? There is already differentiated. Only 6 out of 10, sometimes much less to be yes! . Reply And when you ask a little further: Does your voice to influence policy? Then turning to the initial ratio to radically because 9 out of 10 are to attest that they tend to feel that the elected politicians do anyway, what they want.
Ask people around you: You live in a democracy? The answer of 9 out of 10 is clear: Yes! And then you go? There is already differentiated. Only 6 out of 10, sometimes much less to be yes! . Reply And when you ask a little further: Does your voice to influence policy? Then turning to the initial ratio to radically because 9 out of 10 are to attest that they tend to feel that the elected politicians do anyway, what they want.
The resulting Phenomenon is then called politics.
This blog makes the determination for the cause of political apathy, and the formulation of feasible ways out for the task. It is about nothing less than achieving real democracy. Yes we can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)